I almost don't know where to begin ...
There is absolutely no reason for forcing nonathletic boys to participate in competitive team sports in mandatory P.E. classes. I could mention each of the arguments and refute them one by one, but I've already done that in brief in a post I submitted yesterday.
The hypocrisy of the P.E. establishment never fails to astound me. When I was in school in the United States, there were "Remedial Math" and "Remedial English" classes for those students who were having difficulty with those subjects. But there was no such class as "Remedial P.E." for boys who weren't good at sports. Such boys were viewed as not being worthy of any consideration whatsoever. I'm more generous to the athletic crowd than they've ever been to nonathletes. I have no trouble with team sports in the schools, as long as "sports only" P.E. is NOT mandatory. Such classes are useless and even detrimental to nonathletic kids in more ways than one.
As I'm sure was true of the P.E. classes you were forced to take, there was no "physical education" in P.E., which really should have been called "M.S." for "Mandatory Sports." In one of my junior high P.E. classes, once I had to play in a basketball game, even though I didn't even know how the game was played! Never seemed to occur to the coach that there might actually be a few boys in his class who didn't know how to play basketball; so, he didn't bother asking the class if everyone knew how to play the game. The result for me was just another humiliating experience. No "education" was involved.
Decades later when I was 57 years old, I had started working with my first personal trainer at the local health club. Sometimes he would vary the workout routine by introducing me to a sport. He was an intelligent young guy who was proficient at several different sports. A nice kid who had been raised right. In other words, he wasn't a jerk like Samdaman
or SpeedofLeight. One day he showed me how to shoot a basketball. I had been under the impression that shooting a basketball was simply a matter of thrusting the ball through the air towards the hoop. I was amazed when he showed me in his instruction that shooting a basketball is a
skill that is not learned overnight, but involves repeated practice in developing it. He showed me that this skill involves particular wrist and finger actions, which is not at all what I had assumed. Perhaps it's like learning how to type.
What is the point of this? I could have learned how to shoot a basketball
if I had been taught how. Not that I was even interested in the sport, but I could have learned how to play basketball without too much effort. But the teaching of athletic skills was not conducted
at all in any of the P.E. classes that I and my nonathletic friends were forced to take. I have an older daughter who, when she was in high school, had a lousy teacher who "taught" her calculus class. Actually, she didn't do any teaching. She just told the students to teach themselves. Fortunately, my wife (who is the mother of our two daughters) had taught high-school math classes, including calculus, for 11 years. So, our daughter was taught calculus by her mother, not her teacher. The lousy math teacher was FIRED at the end of the year. But a P.E. teacher or coach who
doesn't teach ... is he ever fired? Not if the football team he coaches has a winning season. Well, actually, that's not the only reason.
In the United States two of our middle-aged members were physically impaired when they were boys. One of them (username Fat Man) had sustained a knee injury in a car wreck when he was 4 years old. He could not run and could walk with only a limp. The other (username greencom) was born with an eye defect that left him without depth perception, which definitely poses a problem in attempting to play a sport. Now, any person with half a brain would figure that physically impaired students should be
exempted from P.E.; but such common sense seems to have evaded the P.E. establishment when we were kids, as they were NOT exempted. Did any of their coaches or athlete classmates ever show them any consideration at all? No, they didn't! Of course, bullying was tolerated. In my opinion, Sportshater2000, because of your asthma, you
never should have been forced to take "sports only" P.E. And as far as I'm concerned, anyone who cannot understand why you don't like sports, considering what you went through in "sports only" P.E., is a complete idiot, not to mention totally lacking in empathy.
Please correct me if I'm mistaken. You're not having to take "sports only" P.E. now, right? If you wouldn't mind hearing some homespun advice from me, here goes: To help yourself rise above the bitterness you feel (which is quite understandable), you need to boost your self-esteem by developing proficiency in an academic subject that will serve you well when you're an adult. For example, suppose you have an interest in physics. Learn as much as you can NOW while you have the opportunity. You should also devote much attention to any other academic discipline that is related to your object of expertise. In this example, for instance, you would also definitely have to master math. I'm speaking from the standpoint of experience. Find something to excel in, especially something that will help you earn a good living. You've suffered a negative. Overcome that negative with a positive.