I tried to be reasonable in my last few posts, but now after reading DanTran's ridiculously ignorant comment, I'm not going to be as polite to Dan as I tried to be before.
DanTran wrote:HugeFan: For someone on "our side," you seem to be siding with the sports fans. "Dedicated to the eradication of sports." You might think it's tongue in cheek, but for people like Fat Man and I, it's all too real.
So what, now I'm a traitor? Seriously? Grow up, stop acting like a child. I've argued with people for and against this site many times, I don't choose one side regardless of who is actually more rational. If someone makes an ignorant post, I may argue against them regardless of whose side they are on. And right now, you are by far more irrational and ignorant than any of the sports fans in this thread. Only the trolls who come on here solely to anger people make less intelligent posts than you, and that's probably because they're actually trying to be as unintelligent as they can.
People shouldn't like sports, and people shouldn't be allowed to participate in them or enjoy them. I lost my job because of sports (if you haven't read it, I made a thread all about it). Sports forced me to punch a man in the face. Sports forced me to do drugs in college.
You idiot. You
knowingly went to a party where you knew the only reason for it was because of sports. You had a choice not to go. You went anyway, and then when you rudely started criticizing them because of something you don't like even though you didn't have to be there in the first place, and when the host tried to get you to leave
his own house, you punched him in the face? If you blame sports for that, you are a pathetic human being. You got yourself fired, stop trying to feel better about yourself by blaming it on yourself. On top of that, you also chose to do drugs in college, sports didn't make that decision.
Additionally, because of what you said about the charities at your workplace, not only do you seem to be irrational, you seem to be immoral. There's nothing wrong with a charity that allows handicapped people to participate in sports. They should be able to choose to play sports if they wish, just like other people have the ability to do, and I find it sickening that you think otherwise. You haven't been around this forum for long, so you may not have noticed that many of the regular posters here do not actually want the eradication of sports at all, they just want people to be able to have the ability not to be involved in sports without being ridiculed if they are not interested in sports. They want people to have a choice over whether or not they wish to be involved with sports. And by having something against a charity that gives handicapped people that choice, not only is it an immoral opinion, but you're also going against the ideas of many members of this forum. Who's the traitor now?
The second charity you mentioned makes you an even worse person. It's a charity that doesn't promote sports, but simply uses them to help their cause to assist children suffering from cancer. And you wouldn't be involved simply because you couldn't get over your hatred for sports. Playing in one little softball game would not harm anyone, but you still refused to help children dying from cancer. You seriously lack any sense of morality.
To try and defend sports as a normal hobby that even geniuses can take part in is misunderstanding the problem. Einstein fucked his cousin (or something like that). Is that okay? You seem to be "rooting" for these scientists like many assholes root for football players...
Wow, now you're saying that scientists are also bad people, not only athletes? Fat Man, do you have anything to say about this? Apparently Dan is not okay with looking up to scientists who have made enormous contributions to society with their knowledge that has been used for countless useful applications such as medicine, computers, electricity. Many intellectuals have flaws, but in the case of Einstein, his flaws only affected those in his personal life. I don't care about Einstein's personal flaws and his relationship with his cousin, because I don't look up to Einstein as a guide on how to live my personal life, I don't look up to scientists for moral guidelines (something which you seriously lack). I only look up to their devotion to science and their incredible intellectual abilities that have helped the world enormously. Einstein's personal flaws affected only the people in his personal life, while his scientific works have improved countless live enormously.
HugeFanOfBadReligion wrote:I don't see how you could question the intelligence of someone who made a tremendous amount of innovation in the field of physics (something which can only be done by the brightest people) simply because they have an interest in sports. If they demonstrate a high level of intelligence, and contribute to the world with their knowledge, why should a person's interests that only affect their personal lives have any influence on their intellectual reputation?
That's like the whole point of this forum.
You haven't been on this forum for long, and I don't think you are aware of the fact that most people on this forum don't share the exact same opinions that you find on the home page of this website. Most people on this site wouldn't have any problem with people who have greatly helped the world but have a mild interest in sports.
HugeFanOfBadReligion wrote:
I'm sure geniuses have many normal interests, you just won't find them in the biographies of those people because normal things aren't really worth mentioning.
Someone thought they were worth mentioning. You know of Feynman's bongo playing and strip club hopping. And btw, these geniuses dedicate their entire lives to their work. I find it hard to believe that many of them would even have time to watch sports, or even want to. Don't mistake eccentricity for normalcy.
Feynman's bongo playing is known about because he was very passionate about it. His attendance of strip clubs was known about because when the strip club was going to be closed down for some legal reason, out of all of the patrons who were asked to defend the strip club in court, Feynman was the only one who did, as everyone else was afraid of their families finding out about it. Feynman didn't care about that. These interests of his were noted because, as you said in your earlier posts, these are unusual interests. Nobody would have cared if Feynman sometimes tuned in to listen to a sports broadcast on the radio occasionally, because that is completely normal, and thus it wouldn't have been recorded in history.
Hey, if you can find me a genius , a noteworthy one who watched sports and enjoyed it (IQ levels and everything) then maybe I can calm down with my judgements. Until that happens, sports are for idiots.
Most people, even geniuses like Einstein and Newton, don't have an IQ listed anywhere in history. Many geniuses were around before IQ tests even existed. However, Charles Darwin, who made significant advancements in the field of biology, was interested in sports I believe. I can't find a source for that, however, as I remember reading it in one of Earl's posts, so you could ask him for more about that if you wish. As for individuals who had a very high IQ level, here is a Wikipedia list of notable individuals who were members of Mensa, which is only open to people who have an IQ higher than the 98th percentile:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mensans
There are a few athletes on that list. I'm not going to read about every single person on that list to find out which ones watched sports, but I'm sure a few of them did. However, that list shows that even some athletes themselves are also at the "genius" level of intelligence.
To the other active members of the forum: I apologize for making a post like this against a new member, as I know this forum needs as much activity as it can get, but DanTran's last post frustrated me quite a bit. This will likely be my last post in this argument, as I don't wish to continue it any further as no one is going to change their opinion because of it.