Earl wrote:He's not very "kind, tolerant" himself, is he? I wonder how he interacts with "nerds" at his high school. (I'm not sure I'd like to know.) I wonder if they would say he's "kind, tolerant."
I like the sarcastic tone in that post. Such a tone is absolutely ideal when responding to a moron who can't even abide by his own arguments on a forum. "Kind, tolerant". What a load of crap coming from him.
SPORTS DICKHEAD. wrote:Yeah i have friends that dont do sports. I nevre said i was "kind, tolerant" - i'm a bit mean.
Wow, way to support your own argument, dickhead. If you're going to say all athletes are "kind, tolerant" and then admit proudly that you're NOT "kind, tolerant" yourself then you're not really making much of a case, are you. The law applies to you too. Get your head out your arse and hit us with something real.
It reminds me of another odious sports bore who went and called all video games "gay" and for "nerds with no lives" then admitted in a post that he did play video games which he didn't consider "gay". And when he was challenged over this his mere retort was "oh yeah jocks can choose". I don't understand how running around grasping other men in tights somehow gives you the right to define what things are "gay" and which are "cool". I fail to see how it makes a person better than others, and I am particularly struggling to understand how players of such a homoerotic sport as American footbore have such a God-given right to demean activities by calling them "gay". Please clarify your position.
SPORTS DICKHEAD. wrote:ever heard of pride in your team?
No I haven't. Some people believe in achieving things in their own lives themselves instead of letting the team decide their feelings for them. Now why don't you grow up and do the same.
Best regards,
i_like_1981