Re: Non-ignorant athlete/sports fan here- please read
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:09 am
So he won't be coming back? The way he criticized Fat Man, me, and Fitz is flaming us.
Not Everyone is a Brain-dead Sports Fan!
https://sportssuck.org/phpbb/
Earl wrote:I concur with Skul. SportsGuy92's criticisms were reasonable, not abusive. Fat Man, instead of specifically acknowledging his apology to you, you continued to be confrontational by saying "it's up to us to break him of his know-it-all attitude and show him where the proverbial bear shits in the proverbial buckwheat." Sergey, you called him "shit for brains," "dumb asses like you," "you idiot," and "you dumb fuck." What names did he call you? Believe me, I don't get any pleasure pointing this out.
If you had read my other posts, you would be able to see that while I enjoy sports, I am far from someone who treats it like a religion. I am not trying to ram my views down anybody's throat. I am neither trying to nor will be able to convert anyone on here into a sports fan. I am just trying to understand why some people view them so negatively. By "respect" referring to the following that high school sports and their players have, I meant the attention they receive from the general public (fan attendance, media coverage, etc.) This is where jock arrogance, in my opinion, usually stems from although you may have different theories or opinions.Millhouse wrote:
Anti-sports people? No, sir. People with the degree of hatred for it that you find on this site.
As for human nature dictating that if one medium were to lose its popularity and be taken over by another, and overzealous individuals making the new popular medium miserable for everyone else, that's kind of beside the point I was making, and I already know all this.
I do not share the opinion some of the others have stated in that I see a use for sports. Much in the same way I see a use for a paperweight or doorstop, it keeps the more animalistic elements of the gene pool in line in that it gives them something to do. An 'outlet', if you will, to both appreciate and engage in observing and participating in various forms of physically aggressive behaviour.
And they can do that all they like. To each their own. Here is my problem with it.
Problem with it is harrassment and discrimination if I myself don't enjoy it, don't have any use for it, and don't wish to participate in it. Because I am human, it is assumed that I must also partake in the 'fun', whether it be some company baseball team, fantasy football league, or some other such nonsense, such as going to a sporting event. Harassment at this level is irritating enough, but many, many sports fans actually get offended at saying a resounding and most of the time polite 'no' to these activities.
Then in many cases, the ostracizing begins.
There is no good, reasonable excuse for this behaviour. There never was, and there never will be. I will state this again, plainly and clearly, because you ignored it in my first post. People who treat it like a religion are the ones I go after. And frankly, I think they deserve it for ramming it down my throat.
As for jocks bullying others, sporting activities in high school starts the heirarchy, and as a former nerd and someone who could get along with but not be a goth kid, I can tell you that your statement about their area of expertise being 'respected' is completely inaccurate. Goth kids and company generally didn't respect jocks. The difference is the jocks did the bullying. It has nothing to do with respect.
As a pro-sports person, I'm never going to be fully able to understand the anti-sports view, just as you will never understand why people would spend money to sit and watch a game in a stadium. That doesn't mean I am incapable of understanding why you fell that way, even though I will never be able to fully empathize with your point of view.Millhouse wrote:
Other issue is that I side even with the people that carry the more extreme views on here, because they understand how I feel. And although I do not agree with their viewpoints on banning sports altogether, I respect their opinions and I feel a lot of empathy for them because I (unlike you) actually understand the things that brought them to where they are.
Sure, their views may be extreme to you, but are you bothering to ask why they are? How these people got this way? As a person that at minimum feigns intelligence on these forums (you may be genuinely intelligent), maybe you should take a step back from your defensive attitude, which you had the moment you made your first post, and ask yourself in a positive manner, why these people you are attacking from the get go are the way they are.
I'm not asking you to be a pacifist here. I'm just suggesting you could be a little more fair than you're being.
What you mention here is not strictly an issue with pro athletes, it is an issue with celebrities in general. Any kind of celebrity, no matter what they are famous for, will always get breaks because of their power and wealth that everyday people can't get.Fat Man wrote:
No, I would not call all blacks rapists just simply because some black guy rapes somebody, because white guys also commit rape.
The difference is, when a mere mortal, black or white commits rape, if found guilty in a court of law, they go to prison.
But when some drooling slack-jawed knuckle-dragging moron commits rape, if he happens to be a professional football player, black or white, he usually goes unpunished, or only gets a slap on the wrist, but most of the time, not even that, he gets a pat on the back from his coach, a brand new car for FREE, and a millions dollar raise on his yearly contract.
If more people determine that a so called "primitive game" should reward more money than a virtual game, as they currently do, then what you think is crazy. You are far too ignorant about sports to write them off as being primitive games. Every sport requires strategy as much as any video or board game.Sergey wrote: Well he said I was crazy for thinking a virtual game should reward more money than a primitive game. If he gets so mad at me for that I am sure what I said is viable.
SportsGuy92 wrote:If more people determine that a so called "primitive game" should reward more money than a virtual game, as they currently do, then what you think is crazy. You are far too ignorant about sports to write them off as being primitive games. Every sport requires strategy as much as any video or board game.Sergey wrote: Well he said I was crazy for thinking a virtual game should reward more money than a primitive game. If he gets so mad at me for that I am sure what I said is viable.
Earl wrote:Sergey, he never said you were crazy.
Come on, people. Let's treat others as individuals instead of as members of a group. This is a nice guy, but you're treating him as The Enemy. I'm getting sick and tired of it.
Well, I did say that I agreed with most of what he said, NOT EVERYTHING, but most.Earl wrote:Sergey, he never said you were crazy.
Come on, people. Let's treat others as individuals instead of as members of a group. This is a nice guy, but you're treating him as The Enemy. I'm getting sick and tired of it.
Ah! But didn't you say that you once had a good paying job in sports? You can easily afford to buy your own computer.SportsGuy92 wrote:If any of you think I am taking too long to respond, I'm sorry. Just remember that a computer is not available to me whenever I want.
Well, when I was in school, I wanted to study science, and eventually go on to college to get a degree in Physics and Astronomy, and to move about in the more intellectual circles, associating with people like Carl Sagan, Isaac Asimov, Stephen Hawkins, etc. etc.SportsGuy92 wrote:. . . . . but when you love your sport you should be grateful for being able to have a job that many dream of but few attain.
Excuse me JIMBO, but Damn is not God's last name!!!SportsGuy92 wrote:. . . it seemed like the point wasn't to get exercise but memorize every goddamn rule of whatever . . .
Hmmmmm! "As much strategy as any video or board game."SportsGuy92 wrote:If more people determine that a so called "primitive game" should reward more money than a virtual game, as they currently do, then what you think is crazy. You are far too ignorant about sports to write them off as being primitive games. Every sport requires strategy as much as any video or board game.Sergey wrote:Well he said I was crazy for thinking a virtual game should reward more money than a primitive game. If he gets so mad at me for that I am sure what I said is viable.
SportsGuy92 wrote:Every sport requires strategy as much as any video or board game.
Okay, I'm cutting through the b.s. with this, let's look at the breakdown of train of thought here...SportsGuy92 wrote:If you had read my other posts, you would be able to see that while I enjoy sports, I am far from someone who treats it like a religion. I am not trying to ram my views down anybody's throat. I am neither trying to nor will be able to convert anyone on here into a sports fan. I am just trying to understand why some people view them so negatively. By "respect" referring to the following that high school sports and their players have, I meant the attention they receive from the general public (fan attendance, media coverage, etc.) This is where jock arrogance, in my opinion, usually stems from although you may have different theories or opinions.Millhouse wrote: And they can do that all they like. To each their own. Here is my problem with it.
Problem with it is harrassment and discrimination if I myself don't enjoy it, don't have any use for it, and don't wish to participate in it. Because I am human, it is assumed that I must also partake in the 'fun', whether it be some company baseball team, fantasy football league, or some other such nonsense, such as going to a sporting event. Harassment at this level is irritating enough, but many, many sports fans actually get offended at saying a resounding and most of the time polite 'no' to these activities.
As a pro-sports person, I'm never going to be fully able to understand the anti-sports view, just as you will never understand why people would spend money to sit and watch a game in a stadium. That doesn't mean I am incapable of understanding why you fell that way, even though I will never be able to fully empathize with your point of view.
First --there is a link, a correlation, a connection between people that like sports and abusive, rude people. You just can't see it because you happen to like sports. The same way an alcoholic can never see that his pals have a drinking problem.SportsGuy92 wrote:
But what pisses me off about the people on this board is that they believe that there is some kind of link between enjoying sports and being unintelligent, arrogant, rude etc. I'm not going to lie and try to deny that there are athletes who do look down on those who aren't good at sports or just don't care (I'm not one of them). But for every jock out there who looks down on people who don't care about sports, there is the intellectual nerd who looks down on the less smart, the theater kid who looks down on people who don't appreciate musicals, the goths (and more recently emos) who bitch about how everyone else is a mindless conformist when they themselves are conforming to their own group, and so on.
True. It's free country and I do vote with my feet. And since it is a free country I will continue to do what I can to bring sanity back to TV programming. I will complain LOUDLY to my cable provider that sports are NOT news!SportsGuy92 wrote:
Finally, quit whining about sports media coverage. We do not live in a fascist police state where you are forced to watch or read about sports against your will. Our economy is based on people choosing how to spend their time and money the way they want to. Don't like a restaurant showing sports on TV? Take your money and eat elsewhere. Just because some people enjoy 24/7/365 sports channels like ESPN doesn't mean you have to watch them.
You do? GOOD! In the immortal words of George Bush, Mission Accomplished!SportsGuy92 wrote: Finally there are certain people on this website who I find to be really ignorant and annoying.
SportsGuy92 wrote:I meant to post this earlier, but for some reason I wasnâ??t able to because it automatically signed me out.
Finally, about the comment I made about Fitz301 and plentyoffish.com, I can see why you didnâ??t understand it. I discovered it while looking for posts of his. Do a google search for Fitz301 and you will see what I mean. It should be the 4th result.
Ever the gentleman. I'm glad cooler heads are here to keep us in line.Earl wrote:I concur with Skul. SportsGuy92's criticisms were reasonable, not abusive. Fat Man, instead of specifically acknowledging his apology to you, you continued to be confrontational by saying "it's up to us to break him of his know-it-all attitude and show him where the proverbial bear shits in the proverbial buckwheat." Sergey, you called him "shit for brains," "dumb asses like you," "you idiot," and "you dumb fuck." What names did he call you? Believe me, I don't get any pleasure pointing this out.