Page 2 of 2

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:54 pm
by abitagirl
Detroitsportsfan08 wrote:
Here I am, by myself, holding my own against a group of posters.

Wow, you brave soul. :roll: Never mind that you're the one intruding, not us.

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 2:21 am
by Indurrago
Detroitsportsfan08 wrote: Here I am, by myself, holding my own against a group of posters.
Can you explain something to me? How did we become from human beings to "posters"? I just wanna know you're logic. :D Last time I checked posters were inanimate objects.

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:27 pm
by Detroitsportsfan08
Because we are online. Therefore, I am not fighting against humans, I'm merely debating with other posters like myself. There are a couple different ways to use the word poster, again, like I said in another thread, learn english.

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:41 am
by Ray
Detroitsportsfan08 wrote:Because we are online. Therefore, I am not fighting against humans, I'm merely debating with other posters like myself. There are a couple different ways to use the word poster, again, like I said in another thread, learn english.
You're not debating anything. Preferences can't be argued. They're personal convictions. All you're doing is polluting the air with your insistence that you're right and we're wrong. And there's no support for that. You belong with other mongoloids. Ranting about DA BIG GAME COACH.

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:21 pm
by Detroitsportsfan08
Preferences most certainly can be argued.

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:16 pm
by Fitz301
Detroitsportsfan08 wrote:Preferences most certainly can be argued.

Glad you said that, because I would have to argue that you're a typical sports jerk based on your preference for sports.

Fitz301 :twisted:

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:21 pm
by Ray
a HA HA HA HAHA HA HA HAHA HA HA



the prosecution rests! :lol:

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:21 am
by Detroitsportsfan08
Fitz301 wrote:
Detroitsportsfan08 wrote:Preferences most certainly can be argued.

Glad you said that, because I would have to argue that you're a typical sports jerk based on your preference for sports.

Fitz301 :twisted:

Which would again, be a stereotype, and again, be close minded. However, can't say I'm surprised given the all around rudeness of this board.

But wait, I thought you guys were supposed to be calm, civilized, nice, and intelligent and open minded?

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 7:09 am
by Fitz301
Hey, I NEVER claimed to be any of those things...so don't stereotype me, man!

Fitz301 :twisted:

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:50 pm
by blackdog4444
When did I ever say I was nice and calm?! That'd be like satan praying to god right there! :lol:

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:55 pm
by Millhouse
Detroitsportsfan08 wrote:
Fitz301 wrote:
Detroitsportsfan08 wrote:Preferences most certainly can be argued.

Glad you said that, because I would have to argue that you're a typical sports jerk based on your preference for sports.

Fitz301 :twisted:

Which would again, be a stereotype, and again, be close minded. However, can't say I'm surprised given the all around rudeness of this board.

But wait, I thought you guys were supposed to be calm, civilized, nice, and intelligent and open minded?
Hmmm. That is quite an indictment considering the type of people you're championing. Yes, we know we're in the minority wherever we go, we don't need you to remind us of this fact. Most of us also don't dispute it. But this IS a biased message forum, it was designed that way, a place for the minority to come and ventilate about what vexates them; sports and sports fans. And in here, YOU are the minority. You might as well get used to it. It will improve your debate skills.

Re: Sports ruining TV

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:30 pm
by blackdog4444
Well, as the dedicated few say:

Always outnumbered, never outgunned.