Welcome back, Imperialist. Long time no see. It's been a bit... quieter on here in your absence, but with the number of posts you've always got in store for this site, it would seem a lot quieter.The Imperialist wrote:1984... interesting book. Gives interesting ideas.
But that is only if surveillance becomes an art for its own sake... as long as it remembers its original utilitarian/security objectives, it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
I look upon civil liberties as something that can only be given if everone is actually responsible for their own actions. If not, well, security measures are needed for the upkeep of order.
The book 1984 is one of my favourites as well. It was written shortly after the death of Hitler who had of course turned Germany into a totalitarian state where nobody at all was permitted to speak out against the Nazi leadership under the threat of certain discovery and death if they did. If somebody like Hitler had today's technology in their grasp they could more than easily make this book a reality, and having read it, it makes me aware of how important it is that we do not allow any more extremists to take control of our country. Over here our equivalent of the Nazi party would be the British National Party, and having learned lessons on what happened in the past when far-right extremists took control of a whole country, it is good to see that most people today are rejecting and mocking their extreme ideals. The world has learned from what happened under Hitler in the 1930s and 40s. We must take precautions and shout down all extreme political parties to ensure that has no chance of happening again and we remain a society where people of all backgrounds can be entitled to equal treatment and opportunities.
Security measures are needed to some extent to keep people in line, I fully agree. We need CCTV in public places to ensure that any crimes committed can be solved easier and quicker with video evidence to help. But I draw the line when this surveillance involves invading people's privacy in their own property. People are entitled to one place on the earth where they can do and say as they please without fear of being watched, and that is their home. The place they legally own and reside in. They have to be allowed that amount of privacy seeing as how near enough everything they do in the outside world is recorded, logged or seen in some way.
Best regards,
i_like_1981